2200s: Difference between revisions

From Starfleet Command
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Summary==
==Summary==
* [[Starfleet]]'s Defense Command is deemed to have enough of the right type of ships to meet present [[Federation]] defensive needs (assuming no expansion).<ref name=Trent>[[Guide: Trent/Apache/Kovaris]]</ref>
* By this year, areas patrollable by small vessels are largely stabilized.<ref name=Hunter>[[Guide: Hunter]]</ref>
 
* Starfleet is considering meeting the current demands for cruisers in long-range support of the Federation, very little advance planning and virtually nothing in terms of contingency plans existed for the destroyer force. Considerations for defense of the outer systems under the UFP control lead to a light destroyer class as an answer.<ref name=Trent/>
 
* Starfleet continues to significantly downscale its operations, hoping to provide time and resources for its reorganization.<ref name=Castor>[[Guide: Castor]]</ref>
 
* The dockyards simply aren’t up to the task of building the numbers of heavy cruisers required.<ref name=Mann>[[Guide: Mann]]</ref>
 
* By this year, areas patrollable by such small vessels are largely stabilized.<ref name=Hunter>[[Guide: Hunter]]</ref>
 
<br>


==Years==
==Years==
Line 24: Line 14:
*[[2209]]
*[[2209]]


<br>
==Events==
==Events==
* [[Star Fleet]]'s Defense Command is deemed to have enough of the right type of ships to meet present [[Federation]] defensive needs (assuming no expansion).<ref name=Trent>[[Guide: Trent/Apache/Kovaris]]</ref>
* While Star Fleet is considering meeting the current demands for cruisers in long-range support of the Federation, very little advance planning and virtually nothing in terms of contingency plans exist for the destroyer force. Considerations for defense of the outer systems under the UFP control leads to a light destroyer class as an answer.<ref name=Trent/>
* Star Fleet continues to significantly downscale its operations, hoping to provide time and resources for its reorganization.<ref name=Castor>[[Guide: Castor]]</ref>
* The dockyards simply aren’t up to the task of building the numbers of heavy cruisers required.<ref name=Mann>[[Guide: Mann]]</ref>


<br>
==References==
==References==
<references />
<references />

Revision as of 05:43, 5 February 2020

Summary

  • By this year, areas patrollable by small vessels are largely stabilized.[1]

Years

Events

  • Star Fleet's Defense Command is deemed to have enough of the right type of ships to meet present Federation defensive needs (assuming no expansion).[2]
  • While Star Fleet is considering meeting the current demands for cruisers in long-range support of the Federation, very little advance planning and virtually nothing in terms of contingency plans exist for the destroyer force. Considerations for defense of the outer systems under the UFP control leads to a light destroyer class as an answer.[2]
  • Star Fleet continues to significantly downscale its operations, hoping to provide time and resources for its reorganization.[3]
  • The dockyards simply aren’t up to the task of building the numbers of heavy cruisers required.[4]

References





2190s Category:Timeline
23rd century
2210s