Guide:Capella: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
* 1-3x shuttlepods | * 1-3x shuttlepods | ||
|historicalships=<br> | |historicalships=<br> | ||
* ''USS Capella'' | * ''USS Bellatrix'' (NCC-S462) | ||
* ''USS Capella'' (NCC-I609) | |||
* ''USS Hypatia'' (NCC-I624/NCC-S415) | * ''USS Hypatia'' (NCC-I624/NCC-S415) | ||
|design= Masao Okazaki, Allen Rolfes | |design= Masao Okazaki, Allen Rolfes | ||
| Line 73: | Line 74: | ||
|history= Masao Okazaki, Christopher Bennett | |history= Masao Okazaki, Christopher Bennett | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[File:Capella menagerie.png|left|200px|thumb|A menagerie of payloads, warp engine types and placement options demonstrates what could be done with a fleet of | [[File:Capella menagerie.png|left|200px|thumb|A menagerie of payloads, warp engine types and placement options demonstrates what could be done with a fleet of ''Capellas''. Any individual vessel would still be limited to a fairly narrow range of missions.]] | ||
Capellas. Any individual vessel would still be limited to a fairly narrow range of missions.]] | |||
The delays met in Project Starship did not completely paralyze | The delays met in Project Starship did not completely paralyze [[Star Fleet]] procurement in the [[2230s]]. | ||
While primary and some secondary combatants were put on hold pending the outcome of the | While primary and some secondary combatants were put on hold pending the outcome of the | ||
Project, plans for smaller support types continued to receive funding and access to the latest in | Project, plans for smaller support types continued to receive funding and access to the latest in | ||
propulsive, power production and computing technology. In 2238, Salazaar was tasked with | propulsive, power production and computing technology. In [[2238]], [[Salazaar Fleet Builders|Salazaar]] was tasked with | ||
creating a high endurance, deep space survey and surveillance type for the needs of the intelligence | creating a high endurance, deep space survey and surveillance type for the needs of the intelligence | ||
community, replacing the Hale class and emphasizing affordability over the technological ambitions | community, replacing the ''[[Guide:Hale|Hale]]'' class and emphasizing affordability over the technological ambitions | ||
that had hobbled the earlier program. | that had hobbled the earlier program. | ||
[[File:No Photo Available.jpg|left|200px|thumb|In this dorsal bow view, the Hypatia reveals many of the features upgraded in her 2249 refit at a glance. In evidence | [[File:No Photo Available.jpg|left|200px|thumb|In this dorsal bow view, the ''Hypatia'' reveals many of the features upgraded in her [[2249]] refit at a glance. In evidence | ||
are the sleek PB-34 nacelles with their proudly extended deflector spires and the curved source-end field visors of the B | are the sleek PB-34 nacelles with their proudly extended deflector spires and the curved source-end field visors of the B | ||
variant; the QIK-09 tactical sensor domes aft of the 130/.6 laser mounts; the dorsal antennas of the new cargo | variant; the QIK-09 tactical sensor domes aft of the 130/.6 laser mounts; the dorsal antennas of the new cargo | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
previous intelligence gathering identity. Unseen go only the ventral cargo grapple fixtures, holding a modest sensor | previous intelligence gathering identity. Unseen go only the ventral cargo grapple fixtures, holding a modest sensor | ||
pallet on this mission but capable of hauling a frontline refueling module or even a cargo container if needed. The | pallet on this mission but capable of hauling a frontline refueling module or even a cargo container if needed. The | ||
Hypatia also tested ventral mounting of warp engines for the duration of the heavy ‘Absalom’ phase cannon trial runs.]] | ''Hypatia'' also tested ventral mounting of warp engines for the duration of the heavy ‘Absalom’ phase cannon trial runs.]] | ||
The dockyards managed to sketch the required compact design in record time using Pyotr Velikiy | The dockyards managed to sketch the required compact design in record time using ''[[Guide:Pyotr Velikiy|Pyotr Velikiy]]'' | ||
solutions. Key among these was the use of complex, nested hull shapes to efficiently graft a | solutions. Key among these was the use of complex, nested hull shapes to efficiently graft a | ||
compartment for a king-size warp core onto the mission-specific parts of the ship. The bridge and | compartment for a king-size warp core onto the mission-specific parts of the ship. The bridge and | ||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
That the initial mounting of two heritage PB-23 nacelles yielded a pedestrian performance of warp | That the initial mounting of two heritage PB-23 nacelles yielded a pedestrian performance of warp | ||
three cruising and warp 4.8 dash speed in the 2239 trials was an anticipated and accepted outcome | three cruising and warp 4.8 dash speed in the [[2239]] trials was an anticipated and accepted outcome | ||
at this stage of the process. Much like Pyotr Velikiy, the tiny surveyor had been built with | at this stage of the process. Much like ''Pyotr Velikiy'', the tiny surveyor had been built with | ||
robustness as the leading criterion: the short and sturdy pylons could mount a variety of nacelles in the 70,000-100,000 ton, 60-80 m size range, paired either dorsally or ventrally, or even in | robustness as the leading criterion: the short and sturdy pylons could mount a variety of nacelles in the 70,000-100,000 ton, 60-80 m size range, paired either dorsally or ventrally, or even in combinations of four. While the quad-nacelle combination was abandoned for a range of practical | ||
combinations of four. While the quad-nacelle combination was abandoned for a range of practical | reasons, ''USS Capella'' (NCC-I609) tested a ventral positioning for PB-23C even as nineteen sister | ||
reasons, USS Capella (NCC-I609) tested a ventral positioning for PB-23C even as nineteen sister | |||
ships were already undergoing structural assembly. A dorsal mounting was eventually selected for | ships were already undergoing structural assembly. A dorsal mounting was eventually selected for | ||
the entire class, but the alternate hardpoints were retained. | the entire class, but the alternate hardpoints were retained. | ||
In [[2240]], the '''''Capella''''' class entered survey and surveillance duty along the Klingon border, armed | |||
In 2240, the Capella class entered survey and surveillance duty along the Klingon border, armed | |||
with two 600 MW lasers and a host of sensors, the latter domed at the forward and aft ends of the | with two 600 MW lasers and a host of sensors, the latter domed at the forward and aft ends of the | ||
fuel canoes as well as above and below the main hull. The 58 vessels embarked crews of up to a | fuel canoes as well as above and below the main hull. The 58 vessels embarked crews of up to a | ||
hundred and fifty, accommodating researchers and other specialists as needed and carrying up to | hundred and fifty, accommodating researchers and other specialists as needed and carrying up to | ||
sixteen compact laboratory modules at times. As with the Hale, a light F class shuttle and up to | sixteen compact laboratory modules at times. As with the ''Hale'', a [[Guide:Class F2|light F class shuttle]] and up to | ||
three D class pods could be squeezed into the hangarette for planetary forays, although not | three D class pods could be squeezed into the hangarette for planetary forays, although not | ||
efficiently maintained for long missions. Despite the seeming flexibility and versatility, missions | efficiently maintained for long missions. Despite the seeming flexibility and versatility, missions | ||
| Line 125: | Line 123: | ||
the class after a couple of decades of service, starting anew from a clean slate. | the class after a couple of decades of service, starting anew from a clean slate. | ||
Yet the late 2240s offered a tempting alternative. The Procyon corvettes and their offshoot couriers | Yet the late [[2240s]] offered a tempting alternative. The ''[[Guide:Procyon|Procyon]]'' corvettes and their offshoot couriers | ||
and scouts transcended small vessel propulsion doctrine with their PB-34 engines and compact | and scouts transcended small vessel propulsion doctrine with their PB-34 engines and compact | ||
dilithium-focus powerplants – both technologies easily applicable to the Capella spaceframes. The | dilithium-focus powerplants – both technologies easily applicable to the ''Capella'' spaceframes. The | ||
generic, already somewhat archaic hulls would not make for superb corvettes, couriers or scouts, but | generic, already somewhat archaic hulls would not make for superb corvettes, couriers or scouts, but | ||
they would provide a cost-effective basis for a jack of three trades. With modern sensors and | they would provide a cost-effective basis for a jack of three trades. With modern sensors and all new | ||
duotronic mainframes now propelled through deep space at warp five cruising speed, the | duotronic mainframes now propelled through deep space at warp five cruising speed, the | ||
Capellas could take on practical courier loads, bring sensors to bear on fairly distant targets, and | ''Capellas'' could take on practical courier loads, bring sensors to bear on fairly distant targets, and | ||
even provide point defense with the increased power now available to the lasers. In addition, the | even provide point defense with the increased power now available to the lasers. In addition, the | ||
interiors were built to be more reconfigurable than ever, accommodating fabricators, special cargo | interiors were built to be more reconfigurable than ever, accommodating fabricators, special cargo | ||
holds or triage rooms with minimal downtime at spacedock. | holds or triage rooms with minimal downtime at spacedock. | ||
Some forty new keels were also laid down in 2249 to make best possible use of the new capabilities, | Some forty new keels were also laid down in [[2249]] to make best possible use of the new capabilities, | ||
utilizing lightweight materials and simplified structural solutions. As no ventral engine hardpoints | utilizing lightweight materials and simplified structural solutions. As no ventral engine hardpoints | ||
were installed this time, the newbuilds could not mount a cargo grapple there like the seventeen | were installed this time, the newbuilds could not mount a cargo grapple there like the seventeen | ||
refitted original Capellas did; nevertheless, the entire class received new registries, switching from I | refitted original ''Capellas'' did; nevertheless, the entire class received new registries, switching from I | ||
to S prefix to emphasize the general support role. Thanks to the modernization, the class could | to S prefix to emphasize the general support role. Thanks to the modernization, the class could | ||
continue frontline service for two more decades, easing the Hale class to much-awaited retirement | continue frontline service for two more decades, easing the ''Hale'' class to much-awaited retirement | ||
and providing welcome overlap with the follow-on Garneau survey and supply ships. Various | and providing welcome overlap with the follow-on ''[[Guide:Garneau|Garneau]]'' survey and supply ships. Various | ||
minor further upgrades were performed, including the installation of Type VI phasers and two | minor further upgrades were performed, including the installation of Type VI phasers and two | ||
rounds of sensor refits. WD-4 engines were also trialed on the Bellatrix (NCC-S462), and cleared | rounds of sensor refits. WD-4 engines were also trialed on the ''Bellatrix'' (NCC-S462), and cleared | ||
for general use. By the 2270s, the Capella class was hopelessly outdated nevertheless; the last units | for general use. By the [[2270s]], the ''Capella'' class was hopelessly outdated nevertheless; the last units | ||
were retired in 2276, donating the class name (and several individual ship names) for thematic use | were retired in [[2276]], donating the class name (and several individual ship names) for thematic use | ||
by the Tikopai fleet of deep space cruisers. | by the ''[[Guide:Constitution (refit)|Tikopai]]'' fleet of deep space cruisers. | ||
==Gallery== | ==Gallery== | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Capella (stbd).png | |||
File:Capella (bow).png | File:Capella (bow).png | ||
File:Capella (dorsal).png | File:Capella (dorsal).png | ||
File:Capella (stern).png | File:Capella (stern).png | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
===Alternate Images=== | |||
<gallery> | |||
File:Capella (alt) (stbd).png | |||
File:Capella (alt) (bow).png | |||
File:Capella (alt) (dorsal).png | |||
File:Capella (alt) (stern).png | |||
</gallery> | |||
==External Sources== | |||
* [https://vintagestarships.wordpress.com/2017/02/12/2239-capella-class-configuration-i/ Vintage Starships: "2239 – Capella Class (Configuration I)"]: includes 3D views | |||
* [https://vintagestarships.wordpress.com/2017/02/12/2239-capella-class-configuration-ii/ Vintage Starships: "2239 – Capella Class (Configuration II)"]: includes 3D views | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
* | * The first 20 ''Capellas'' had a nacelle hardpoint on the ventral side. | ||
<br> | <br><br> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
*[[Guide: Timo's Guide to Star Fleet|Back to the Table of Contents]] | * [[Guide: Timo's Guide to Star Fleet|Back to the Table of Contents]] | ||
*[[Guide: 2240-2270 - The Final Frontier|Back to "The Final Frontier"]] | * [[Guide: 2240-2270 - The Final Frontier|Back to "The Final Frontier"]] | ||
*[[Guide: Of Ship Statistics|Appendix A: Of Ship Statistics]] | * [[Guide: Of Ship Statistics|Appendix A: Of Ship Statistics]] | ||
*[[Guide: Glossary|Appendix B: Glossary]] | * [[Guide: Glossary|Appendix B: Glossary]] | ||
*[[Guide: Star Fleet Organization - General Outline|Appendix C: Star Fleet Organization - General Outline]] | * [[Guide: Star Fleet Organization - General Outline|Appendix C: Star Fleet Organization - General Outline]] | ||
*[[Guide: Abbreviations From Outside|Appendix D: Abbreviations From Outside]] | * [[Guide: Abbreviations From Outside|Appendix D: Abbreviations From Outside]] | ||
[[Category:Guide|{{PAGENAME}}]] | [[Category:Guide|{{PAGENAME}}]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:22, 3 October 2025
| Capella | |
|---|---|
| Class Overview | |
| Category | surveyor / supply ship |
| Operational | 2239-2276 |
| Constructed | 100 |
| Dimensions | |
| Length |
|
| Beam | 68.0 m |
| Height |
|
| Mass |
|
| Performance | |
| Cruise Speed |
|
| Max Speed |
|
| Endurance | 1 year |
| Complement | |
| Officers | 18 |
| Enlisted |
|
| Passengers |
|
| Tactical Systems | |
| Beam Weapons | Original
Refit 2259
|
| Shields |
|
| Laboratories |
|
| Transporters | Original
Refit
|
| Auxiliary Craft |
|
| Historical | |
| Ships of Note |
|
| Canonicity | |
| Design | Masao Okazaki, Allen Rolfes |
| Name | Christopher Bennett |
| History | Masao Okazaki, Christopher Bennett
|

The delays met in Project Starship did not completely paralyze Star Fleet procurement in the 2230s. While primary and some secondary combatants were put on hold pending the outcome of the Project, plans for smaller support types continued to receive funding and access to the latest in propulsive, power production and computing technology. In 2238, Salazaar was tasked with creating a high endurance, deep space survey and surveillance type for the needs of the intelligence community, replacing the Hale class and emphasizing affordability over the technological ambitions that had hobbled the earlier program.

The dockyards managed to sketch the required compact design in record time using Pyotr Velikiy solutions. Key among these was the use of complex, nested hull shapes to efficiently graft a compartment for a king-size warp core onto the mission-specific parts of the ship. The bridge and surrounding officer accommodations were sunken halfway into a flat, round dome, which in turn was topped by a rectangular cowling that provided headroom for analysis rooms and space for armament, support gear and computing systems. This second deck was offset forward with respect to the oval planform of the next two decks, providing room and easy access for the labor-intensive SSWR-XVIII reactor amidships. A rectangular stern extension housed the remaining vital systems: a dorsal cowling for twin impulse engines was matched by a ventral protrusion for a miniature shuttlebay and adjoining cargo hold, while the upper corners of the extension sported canoe fairings for compacted deuterium, giving the vessel the required interstellar endurance.
That the initial mounting of two heritage PB-23 nacelles yielded a pedestrian performance of warp three cruising and warp 4.8 dash speed in the 2239 trials was an anticipated and accepted outcome at this stage of the process. Much like Pyotr Velikiy, the tiny surveyor had been built with robustness as the leading criterion: the short and sturdy pylons could mount a variety of nacelles in the 70,000-100,000 ton, 60-80 m size range, paired either dorsally or ventrally, or even in combinations of four. While the quad-nacelle combination was abandoned for a range of practical reasons, USS Capella (NCC-I609) tested a ventral positioning for PB-23C even as nineteen sister ships were already undergoing structural assembly. A dorsal mounting was eventually selected for the entire class, but the alternate hardpoints were retained.
In 2240, the Capella class entered survey and surveillance duty along the Klingon border, armed with two 600 MW lasers and a host of sensors, the latter domed at the forward and aft ends of the fuel canoes as well as above and below the main hull. The 58 vessels embarked crews of up to a hundred and fifty, accommodating researchers and other specialists as needed and carrying up to sixteen compact laboratory modules at times. As with the Hale, a light F class shuttle and up to three D class pods could be squeezed into the hangarette for planetary forays, although not efficiently maintained for long missions. Despite the seeming flexibility and versatility, missions soon ran into hardware and space limitations – by no means an unexpected turn of events for a ship this small. Normally, SF Exploration Command and Intelligence would have been satisfied to retire the class after a couple of decades of service, starting anew from a clean slate.
Yet the late 2240s offered a tempting alternative. The Procyon corvettes and their offshoot couriers and scouts transcended small vessel propulsion doctrine with their PB-34 engines and compact dilithium-focus powerplants – both technologies easily applicable to the Capella spaceframes. The generic, already somewhat archaic hulls would not make for superb corvettes, couriers or scouts, but they would provide a cost-effective basis for a jack of three trades. With modern sensors and all new duotronic mainframes now propelled through deep space at warp five cruising speed, the Capellas could take on practical courier loads, bring sensors to bear on fairly distant targets, and even provide point defense with the increased power now available to the lasers. In addition, the interiors were built to be more reconfigurable than ever, accommodating fabricators, special cargo holds or triage rooms with minimal downtime at spacedock.
Some forty new keels were also laid down in 2249 to make best possible use of the new capabilities, utilizing lightweight materials and simplified structural solutions. As no ventral engine hardpoints were installed this time, the newbuilds could not mount a cargo grapple there like the seventeen refitted original Capellas did; nevertheless, the entire class received new registries, switching from I to S prefix to emphasize the general support role. Thanks to the modernization, the class could continue frontline service for two more decades, easing the Hale class to much-awaited retirement and providing welcome overlap with the follow-on Garneau survey and supply ships. Various minor further upgrades were performed, including the installation of Type VI phasers and two rounds of sensor refits. WD-4 engines were also trialed on the Bellatrix (NCC-S462), and cleared for general use. By the 2270s, the Capella class was hopelessly outdated nevertheless; the last units were retired in 2276, donating the class name (and several individual ship names) for thematic use by the Tikopai fleet of deep space cruisers.
Gallery
Alternate Images
External Sources
- Vintage Starships: "2239 – Capella Class (Configuration I)": includes 3D views
- Vintage Starships: "2239 – Capella Class (Configuration II)": includes 3D views
Notes
- The first 20 Capellas had a nacelle hardpoint on the ventral side.