Guide:Sherman

From Starfleet Command
Revision as of 17:40, 26 March 2017 by Dan (talk | contribs) (created)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[[File:|250px|Ptolemy fleet tug / tender]]
Sherman
Class Overview
Category light transport / cargo drone
Operational 2224-2289
Constructed 31 total
  • Robinson (prototype): 1 (built 2217-2224)
  • Ptolemy: 15 (built 2222-2227)
  • Keppler: 15 (built 2255-2258)
  • Ptolemy refit: 14 (converted original 2256)
  • Keppler refit: 15 (converted original 2271-2272)
Dimensions
Length
  • 211.6 m (NX-3800)
  • 212.0 m (Ptolemy original)
  • 222.0 m (Ptolemy refit)
  • 220.1 m (Keppler)
Beam
  • 107.0 m (NX-3800)
  • 127.1 m (standard)
Height
  • 67.2 m (NX-3800)
  • 68.2 m (Ptolemy original)
  • 66.1 m (Ptolemy refit)
  • 67.0 m (Keppler)
Mass
  • 326,500 tons (NX-3800)
  • 421,000 tons (Ptolemy original)
  • 486,500 tons (Ptolemy refit)
  • 626,900 tons (Keppler)
Performance
Cruise Speed
  • w 4 (Ptolemy)
  • w 6 (Ptolemy refit, Keppler)
Tow Speed
  • w 3 (Ptolemy)
  • w 4 (Ptolemy refit, Keppler)
Max Speed
  • w 5.0 (Ptolemy)
  • w 8.0 (Ptolemy refit, Keppler)
Endurance 1 year
Complement
Officers
  • 16 (standard, most dilithium tugs)
  • 22 (with passenger or battle pod)
Enlisted
  • 68 (standard, most dilithium tugs)
  • 198 (with passenger or battle pod)



Cargo
  • 1x 121,600 tons (Ptolemy, typical cargo pod arrangement)
  • 2x-3x 121,600 tons (Keppler,Ptolemy refit, typical cargo pod arrangement)
  • 500,000 tons (maximum load other than pod, typically 2 spare warp nacelles or mass-reduced starship)
Tactical Systems
Beam Weapons

NX-3800:

  • n/a

Ptolemy:

  • 4x laser emitters (500 MW) (single mount) (2 dorsal/2 ventral)

Ptolemy refit, Keppler except NCC-3826:

  • 2x phaser VI emitters (in 2 single banks) (aft bridge)
  • 2x phaser VI emitters (in twin bank) (fwd ventral sensors)

All:

  • Heavily armed battle pods sometimes carried


Shields
  • 1-layer conformal forcefield
  • Primary navigational deflector (support strut)
  • Secondary navigational deflector (fwd hull)
Transporters

Ptolemy:

  • 1x GP (6-pad), Mk I
  • 1x emergency evacuation (22-pad), Mk I
  • All ships brought to Mk II standard after 2241

most Keppler:

  • 1x GP (6-pad), Mk III
  • 1x emergency evacuation (22-pad), Mk III

NCC-3816-3820:

  • 1x GP (6-pad), Mk III
  • 1x cargo, Mk III
  • 1x emergency evacuation (22-pad), Mk III
Auxiliary Craft

Original:

  • 2x shuttlepods
  • 1s work pod

refit 2241, Keppler:

  • 1x work pod
Historical
Ships of Note
  • USS Aristarchus (NCC-3805)
  • USS Keppler (NCC-3816)
  • USS Kidinnu (NCC-3826)
  • USS Ptolemy (NCC-3801)
  • USS Robinson (NX-3800)
Canonicity
Design STII, Franz Joseph (Keppler: aridas sofia)
Name FJ
History FJ



The warp engine advances of the Saladin and Baton Rouge designs soon led to breakthroughs in nonmilitary use as well. As warp engines became faster and more compact, huge cargo carriers were no longer the only economical solution to interstellar cargo transport. Small, fast cargo ships could now compete with the lumbering giants in the carriage of valuables and passengers – or even in the timely delivery of high value bulk such as pergium- or dilithium-rich ore. To take full advantage of the fact, Starfleet decided in 2224 to field a large number of medium transports based on modern warp technology. Even after the introduction of medium warp transports, the sublight ore carriers retained their position in the UFP fleet, but the large fleet cargo vessels of Vanguard lineage gave way to the smaller, newer designs. Also, civilian designs were superseded by Starfleet vessels along many shipping routes in face of the serious military threat of Klingon privateers.

The design Starfleet chose for the first modern transport ships was an ambitious one. Not only was the design to feature top-class warp propulsion, it was also highly automated to allow for efficient loading and unloading of cargo. In later models, piloting operations were also automated, and the ships required only periodical maintenance. These ships were thus designated cargo drones, although they retained full life support in the hull to accommodate the occasional maintenance crews. Despite superficial similarities, little was common with the far more primitive Boyden warpcapable drones of the previous century.

The boxlike central hull featured small priority cargo vaults and inspection crew and passenger facilities, while warp engineering was housed atop it along with tanks for fusion fuel. Three types of modular tank could be clipped on, aft of the dorsal structure, although in practice only the largest model ever saw regular service. Main cargo holds were below the central hull; the centermost structure was fixed and featured elevators, dataways, power and ventilation trunks and multiple cargo airlocks, while storage modules for bulk cargo and liquids, as well as smaller holds for general cargo, could be attached forward and aft of the central structure. The tanks and holds could be maneuvered in place by a cargo crane system, the rails of which extended back from the central hull to allow for unobstructed access to port facilities. Cargo could also be brought onboard via port and starboard airlocks and fluid umbilicals. Finally, if needed, a standard cargo pod could be attached to the crane for towing at low warp.

A basic Sherman drone, or Mk I General Cargo Carrier, with a bulk hold clipped forward and a stack of six general goods modules aft of the ventral section. Noteworthy is the use of the original, small fuel tank, as well as a long crane platform later abandoned.

The commercially obtained warp nacelles, dubbed PB-15 in Starfleet use, were mounted on short, sturdy pylons attached to the cargo elevator support structure. They featured large ramscoops for extended interstellar operations, and were somewhat stubbier than the PB-23 nacelles under development for modern Starfleet transports specifically. Drive plasma was fed through twin conduits running along the cargo crane rails. Power was generated by a large fusion reactor in the warp engineering compartment, and an auxiliary fission reactor was available for shipboard power needs. Impulse power was limited to low performance units at the aft support structure, but reaction control systems were of high quality to help with docking operations.

All around the hull were sensor strips for maximal situational awareness. Advanced optronics enabled both in-system and interstellar navigation with relative ease, although the ships did rely on external guidance cues when maneuvering near orbital installations or loading or offloading cargo. It was also reasonably rarely that the ships would venture outside communications range of traffic control systems that monitored shipping along standard lanes. A foray into the unknown, for example to assist Starfleet survey operations, would almost always be supervised by a live crew.

For crewed operations of extended duration, a further dedicated module would form the bow of the vessel to provide proper berthing. A traditional bridge atop this blocky extension took over from the control room within the core vessel, and in some models was flanked by twin laser cannon for selfdefense. The automated flight control system was not authorized to fire the weapons – they were to be used only in conjunction with high-security cargo transfers, under the supervision of the onboard operating crew and security team. A navigational deflector dish at the bow of the core unit would in turn have to be removed when the crew module was attached, and replaced by a different, crewrated unit attaching to the lower forward cargo hold.

A more refined Mk IIa model sports two bulk holds and the large standard fuel tank, and trails a special half-size cargo pod on the final version of the loading crane platform. Starfleet developed this specialized small cargo pod in the 2250s for military replenishment missions. The Shermans were remarkably unmaneuverable with even these smaller pods in tow; the module saw no commercial use and was retired by 2268.

The initial design was christened Sherman class in the crewed transport incarnation; the first full drone version, produced in parallel, was given the Mk I specifier. The crewed vessels were built in quantity, and quickly became the mainstay of Starfleet light cargo operations. In contrast, the drone class initially only comprised fifteen vessels that were placed under intense scrutiny before fully unpiloted operations could begin. However, a refined drone design eventually went to series production as the Wanda subclass, with 50 alliteratively named hulls completed for Starfleet Merchant Marine use by 2237, twenty of them through converting those crewed Shermans that were in the greatest need of an overhaul to begin with. A prime application was hauling of fissionables, heavy metals or other non-time-critical bulk and goods.

The Mastercom design bureau subsequently fiddled with follow-up variants with minor performance improvements or cargo space arrangement alterations. There was sufficient flexibility in the standard design to reproduce the results of the so-called Mk IIa and Mk IIb modifications, though, and no actual refitting of earlier units took place. A more distinct Alexis subclass with high performance was completed in 2251-56, with uprated PB-16 engines for a maximum speed of full warp 5. The final batch of drones would still largely follow Wanda guidelines, and comprise 70 units swiftly built by Star Fleet Division in 2261-63 under the subclass name Pershing. At the same time, most of the Shermans were converted to fully automated operations.

In addition to SF Merchant Marine use, Starfleet operated several Sherman derivatives as Class Two auxiliaries for fleet supply needs. Regardless of crew complement, these ships were all registered as drones, using the late 22nd and early 23rd century convention of NCC-#G format, where # was a number in the 128-160 (Sherman), 300-349 (Wanda), 480-499 (Alexis) or 1400-1469 (Pershing) range. This separated them from manned transports such as the original crewed Sherman vessels (500-549, with F following the number), as well as from manned supply ships, fuel carriers and general support types (S) or simple cargo pods (C). Non-transports like training ships (T) and local defense and law enforcement vessels (L) as well as repair and maintenance ships (R), warp couriers (D), light intelligence vessels (I), standoff observation ships of more substantial size (O), runabouts and similar small craft (B), and eventually also perimeter ships (P), were also given a special letter designation in this Starfleet scheme, which soon swapped format and applied the code letter before the number. In a further complication, NCC-Q# format was originally used on the Mk I, even though Q later came to denote target drones only. The elaborate system was mostly abandoned in the 2270s, and the various transports were thereafter given simple NCC registries.

Carrying only a single bulk cargo hold, the Antares on detached survey service provides accommodation for her 25 crew in a standard unarmed bow module. Note the sensor/deflector unit at the upper part of the forward cargo assembly, rather than at the bow position of fully automated vessels. Further differentiating this original batch light transport from the drones, the Antares sports an F-series registry. Unlike several of her sisters, NCC-F501 would never see conversion to drone operations, instead being lost to sabotage in 2265.

Some Shermans were drafted to scientific survey duty in addition to their transport role. In the simplest case, this meant that automated Starfleet or UESPA survey gear was bolted onto the hulls to monitor randomly encountered phenomena. In more involving missions, there were science specialists aboard, and the ships were asked to follow predetermined routes for extensive stellar cartography, or sometimes to visit points of interest not directly on their path. USS Antares (NCCF501) met a grisly fate in 2265 on such a mission, as she located and picked up a survivor from a crash while cursorily surveying planet Thasus; the young survivor soon misused supernatural abilities gained from the inhabitants of the planet and ultimately destroyed the Antares, killing twenty-five people.

Typical cargo train operations with atypical tugs. The presence of crew modules on both of the Shermans in this convoy might be considered somewhat superfluous for peacetime operations. In a shot from the 2240s, though, the combination is less uncommon and provides added flexibility in case of hostilities. It also tells of greater doctrinal weight being put on the safe delivery of the cargo than on the safety of the crew.

Uncrewed operations generally presented risk to material goods only. USS Penelope (NCC-G1415) fell into Orion hands in 2256 with a full load of dilithium, but a special forces operation to retrieve it was successful. No charges were pressed against the Orion government at that time – it was believed that support to the government would help curtail independent pirate operations. The policy was indeed successful in uniting most Orion pirates under single (or, at times, double or triple) government that could later be discouraged from continuing state-sponsored piracy. Klingon raids claimed half a dozen further Shermans, and a bizarre friendly fire incident ended the orehauling career of USS Woden (NCC-G325) in 2268, but losses thereafter were limited to retirements due to structural fatigue. A small number of Pershings received LN-61 engines in an economically unviable experiment that did not prolong the lifetime of the class to an appreciable degree. The last Sherman-derived drones were withdrawn from service in the 2290s, and replaced by drone conversions of more modern vessels.

Notes

See Also

Gallery