2200s: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Summary== | ==Summary== | ||
* [[Starfleet]]'s Defense Command is deemed to have enough of the right type of ships to meet present Federation defensive needs (assuming no expansion).<ref name=Trent>[[Guide: Trent/Apache/Kovaris]]</ref> | * [[Starfleet]]'s Defense Command is deemed to have enough of the right type of ships to meet present [[Federation]] defensive needs (assuming no expansion).<ref name=Trent>[[Guide: Trent/Apache/Kovaris]]</ref> | ||
* Starfleet is considering meeting the current demands for cruisers in long-range support of the Federation, very little advance planning and virtually nothing in terms of contingency plans existed for the destroyer force. Considerations for defense of the outer systems under the UFP control lead to a light destroyer class as an answer.<ref name=Trent/> | |||
* Starfleet continues to significantly downscale its operations, hoping to provide time and resources for its reorganization.<ref name=Castor>[[Guide: Castor]]</ref> | * Starfleet continues to significantly downscale its operations, hoping to provide time and resources for its reorganization.<ref name=Castor>[[Guide: Castor]]</ref> | ||
Revision as of 17:29, 6 April 2016
Summary
- Starfleet's Defense Command is deemed to have enough of the right type of ships to meet present Federation defensive needs (assuming no expansion).[1]
- Starfleet is considering meeting the current demands for cruisers in long-range support of the Federation, very little advance planning and virtually nothing in terms of contingency plans existed for the destroyer force. Considerations for defense of the outer systems under the UFP control lead to a light destroyer class as an answer.[1]
- Starfleet continues to significantly downscale its operations, hoping to provide time and resources for its reorganization.[2]
Years
Events
References
| 2190s | Category:Timeline 23rd century |
2210s |