Guide:Class G2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Sidebar Guide ship | {{Sidebar Guide ship | ||
|image=[[File:G2 (stbd).png|250px|Class G2 / HSI(U)-2 'Greyhound' heavy warp shuttle]] | |image=[[File:G2 (stbd).png|250px|Class G2 / HSI(U)-2 'Greyhound' heavy warp shuttle]] | ||
|classname= Class G2 /HSI(U)-2 'Greyhound' | |classname= Class G2 / HSI(U)-2 'Greyhound' | ||
|category= heavy warp shuttle | |category= heavy warp shuttle | ||
|years= [[2215]]-[[2278]] | |years= [[2215]]-[[2278]] | ||
Revision as of 08:14, 5 January 2018
| Class G2 / HSI(U)-2 'Greyhound' | |
|---|---|
| Class Overview | |
| Category | heavy warp shuttle |
| Operational | 2215-2278 |
| Constructed | 276 total:
|
| Dimensions | |
| Length | 13.6 m |
| Beam | 7.7 m |
| Height |
|
| Mass | 63.4 tons |
| Performance | |
| Cruise Speed | w 1 |
| Max Speed | w 1.5 |
| Endurance | 2 weeks |
| Complement | |
| Crew | 2 |
| Passengers | 12
|
| Tactical Systems | |
| Shields |
|
| Canonicity | |
| Design | FASA |
| Name | FASA |
| History | FASA, own
|
The three practical shortcomings of the pathfinding Comet warp shuttle were obvious to Starfleet
from the very beginning. The solution readily presented itself as well: the cost, horizontal footprint
and mass of the craft would be halved by omission of one warp nacelle. Whether such a craft would
retain sufficient performance to work as a starship auxiliary was never truly in question. Yet
whether one could be designed to conform to operational demands was debatable from the very
beginning.
Conceptual studies by VXT confirmed what common sense already suggested: a centerline mounting would leave the craft without utilizable payload volume. Furthermore, installing the ion cascade powerplant ahead or astern of the warp coils would result in a vehicle of impractical length. As the warp propulsion aspect of the Comet design was deemed more important than the ability to operate from aboard starships, Starfleet soon agreed that it would be best to concentrate on creating a compact and affordable warp transport for surface and starbase applications, and to leave the revolution of warp-capable starship auxiliaries for the next generation of craft. The single-nacelled 'Greyhound' was thus adopted as the Class G2 warp shuttle in a form that was inherently incompatible with most starship hangar decks.
Mounting the warp coils above the hull solved the footprint problem, maximized payload volume, and trivialized the issue of ingress and egress. The Greyhound was configured with the DB-20 riding on a dorsal pylon that also housed the impulse propulsion system, and with the CID powerplant at the pylon stem. The control cabin was mounted ahead of the reactor, giving the single pilot an excellent view forward and down, and the single aft-facing engineer an equally direct access to the power systems. The payload of 10 tons of water-equivalent cargo or 12 passengers was carried in the wide lower part of the craft, entering through a forward door beneath the cockpit. The forward leg of the tripod landing gear doubled as the ingress ramp when deployed; a trio of lift engines was arranged in the reverse pattern, with two in front straddling the forward leg and one between the aft pair of legs.
The stack reached a total height of 7.7 meters, making operations from aboard even the largest starship hangars cumbersome. Also, the high mounting of the warp coils and the reactor presented some stability problems at landing. On the other hand, the horizontal footprint of 12.8 m times 7.3 meters was quite reasonable for a craft of such performance. Warp 1.5 could be achieved without field gradient hazards to the crew or the cargo, and impulse performance was found perfectly acceptable.
For some fifteen years, the G2 enjoyed primary warp liaison vessel status and also saw planetary assault service, evolving into four variants: the original Mk I received improved passenger interiors to become Mk II, lost these but gained armoring to become the Mk III assault type, and had the holds reconfigured for maximum cargo capacity in Mk IV. It was only in the 2230s that advancing technology provided the means for further compacting of ion power drives and allowed the production of boxy high volume craft such as the ones adopted as Class F2 and G3 utility shuttles. The former offered no propulsive advantages over the Greyhound but had vastly improved utility as a starship auxiliary, while the latter outperformed the single-naceller so significantly in every respect that it swiftly took over the starbase and surface assignments.
The Greyhounds persisted much like the Comets, serving in secondary roles till the late seventies. The complexity and cost of the pathfinding technology precluded long post-Starfleet careers, though. Only the Mk IV saw small goods delivery service in UPS colors until superseded by commercial dilithium-powered designs.
Gallery
-
Bow view
Notes
- The sidebar height was changed from 7.3 to 7.7 meters, to match the text.