Guide:Guardian (USAF): Difference between revisions

From Starfleet Command
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 48: Line 48:
* The ''Guardians'' have "thermal protection tiling" similar to the US space shuttle, as the USAF intended to have them engage in "atmo skipping" as a combat tactic, in order to confuse targeting of enemy weaponry. By rapidly slowing or changing vector, the craft would not be where the enemy anticipated.
* The ''Guardians'' have "thermal protection tiling" similar to the US space shuttle, as the USAF intended to have them engage in "atmo skipping" as a combat tactic, in order to confuse targeting of enemy weaponry. By rapidly slowing or changing vector, the craft would not be where the enemy anticipated.


* I think we have to just side-step the halving of the ''Guardian'''s fuel tanks (for the ''Verne''), as that would make the original tanks larger the the ''Verne'' itself. My working plan is to actually halve the ''Verne'''s tanks, to bring the ''Guardian'' in at a smaller and more reasonable size.
* I think we have to just side-step the halving of the ''Guardian''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s fuel tanks (for the ''Verne''), as that would make the original tanks larger the the ''Verne'' itself. My working plan is to actually halve the ''Verne''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s tanks, to bring the ''Guardian'' in at a smaller and more reasonable size.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 13:06, 4 August 2023

Guardian combat spacecraft
Guardian
Class Overview
Category combat spacecraft
Operational 2045-xxxx
Constructed 3+
Dimensions
Length xxx m
Beam xxx m
Height xxx m
Mass <25,000 mt
Performance
Max Speed 0.26c
Endurance 9 months
Complement
Crew 5



Tactical Systems
Beam Weapons 1x P61TDM-8 plasma cannon
Missile Weapons 2x missile tubes (w/ 40 Mk III nuclear missiles)
Shields Type I hull plating
Auxiliary Craft 1x spatial shuttlepod
Canonicity
Design Guide: Verne
Name Timo
Class Report Guardian class



Gallery

Notes

  • In Guide:Verne, the Verne class is derived from the design of the Guardian, with "a huge cone similar to the postwar Liberty hulls yet technologically less ambitious and consequently more robust." I literally see the nacelle-less main body of the Verne serving the same function for the Guardian, but with a far less prominent nose cabin. They will have "fission NTR reaction engines" that will be replaced for the Vernes, with a suggestion that the Guardians have several exhaust nozzles.
  • The Vernes also replaced "half the fuel tankage as well as all the particle cannon from the original blueprints" (presumably of the Guardians).
This implies more than one particle cannon. However, I'm partial to the idea of the early-tech, over-powered plasma cannon (not particle) being the "centerpiece" of the vessel, right through the bow's nose. If Adrasil and I can make it work, we'll stick with only one cannon. If not, we'll make it two, three, or four cannons ringing the ship.
  • "Alterations to (the original Guardian) hull form were minimal...Instead, much of the original martial nature of the design survived. For example, the bow cone retained the original two missile tubes while gaining some protrusions necessitated by extended life support systems."
I'm re-interpreting this to mean that the missile tubes were moved forward onto the new bow section.
  • At least three Guardians were constructed pre-war, as three unsalvaged hulls were in orbit following the conflict. It's possible/likely that more were built and lost during the conflict and additional ones were being constructed (at least partially) on the surface, or the unconstructed ones were part of the planned modification of the original series.
  • These ships could serve from forward deployed locations, such as Aphrodite "stations" or asteroid bases. Some will be stationed in Earth orbit come 2053, in order to serve as early forms for the Verne design.
  • The Guardians have "thermal protection tiling" similar to the US space shuttle, as the USAF intended to have them engage in "atmo skipping" as a combat tactic, in order to confuse targeting of enemy weaponry. By rapidly slowing or changing vector, the craft would not be where the enemy anticipated.
  • I think we have to just side-step the halving of the Guardian's fuel tanks (for the Verne), as that would make the original tanks larger the the Verne itself. My working plan is to actually halve the Verne's tanks, to bring the Guardian in at a smaller and more reasonable size.

References