Guide:Galileo

Galileo
Class Overview
Category	experimental propulsion ship
Operational	2028
Constructed	1
Dimensions
Length	300m
Beam	120.7m
Height	120.7m
Mass	15,000 mt
Performance
Max Speed	0.xxc
Endurance	xx
Complement
Crew	98
Canonicity
History	FSC Vol 3

Background

Delta Dynamics

By the mid-2020s, there was a small but growing number of commercial spacecraft designs that followed the introduction of the DY-120 interplanetary transport. These ships represented a myriad of purposes: orbital facility construction, asteroidal ore offloading, main belt exploration, near-Earth scientific explorers, junk retrieval, personnel and tourist transports, most anything relatively local that was not Mars-bound (which was still considered “off limits”).

The Grand Mission was ongoing, with one Aventeur (the Stephen Long) left to launch. The perceived inherent danger of long-distance solar exploration was magnified by the extreme length of these missions; Aventeur I had just arrived at Saturn after eleven years, and was not expected back to Earth for another fourteen. As ion propulsion technology steadily evolved, some astronautical engineers sought to create a drive that would figuratively and literally boost the output and velocity of Earth spacecraft, in order to—at first—dramatically decrease the time that passed to get from one inner system point to another, and then extend the range of those missions. These technologists saw exploration and resource gathering of the Oort cloud as achievable within the next two decades, not something that was a century or longer away, as was commonly accepted.

The propulsion vehicle they had their eye on was of an experimental nuclear thermal rocketry (NTR) design. With nuclear fusion on the cusp of becoming viable for spacecraft, the hyper-expensive Galileo concept envisioned the NTR drive using a reactor utilizing laser excitors to allow the necessary miniaturization. This endeavor would be fueled by liquid hydrogen stored in the bulk of the spacecraft’s hull and could conceivably achieve—with consistent acceleration—an unheard of 0.35 velocity. With such a drive, the inner boundaries of the Oort cloud could be only months away. The nearest star, Proxima Centauri, which was over 35 years distant with the present ion drive technology, would only be a mere 12 years away, a round trip six years less than the entire mission of the Lewis and Clark.

The Galileo test vehicle had a particularly specific design, wherein the massive liquid hydrogen tank dominated. While not specifically necessary for trial runs, it was thought it best to provide an over-abundance of fuel lest a test burn that could not be not be decisively shut off at the intended conclusion left a ship continuing into the void of the outer system and beyond, far out of range of any rescue attempt. There was no considerable concern for this scenario, but the idea was supported with the idea that a successful test run would also validate follow-on vessels that were equipped with enough fuel to both retro-burn for approach to the destination and then return to Earth.

--additional hull description—

Conceptual plans for post-testing operations saw an additional fuel tank—of identical proportions—added to the fore of the Galileo, with a similar-but-doubled habitat ring ahead of that. The original ring, now sandwiched between the two tanks, would be converted into an atmospheric mining space, from which a scoop drogue and rig could be extended into the upper atmosphere of a gas giant, replenishing the fuel tanks with free hydrogen. The increased habitable areas would accommodate the supplies, including foodstuff and spare parts, that would be deemed necessary for mankind’s first interplanetary voyage.

The Galileo testbed entered the history books, not for the achievement of any of these grand designs, but from its catastrophic and early conclusion. What was to have been a simple start-up test of the laser-fusion exciters (the fusion reactor itself was still in the design phase) out at the L5 orbital point instead turned into a silent but huge conflagration as the helium ignited out through the [supply lines] into the massive tank. All 98 crew members, as well as eleven observers, perished immediately.

Gallery

Other Images

• 
• 
  Unrealized interstellar concept

Notes

• In Guide: Columbus series, the ship is described completely with the statement "the hyperexpensive Galileo laser-fusion/NTR project ended in utter financial and technological disaster." It is referencing an experiment in fusion propulsion that occurred prior to the Guide: AFP-1 disaster.

• FSC vol 3 has a brief statement on page 9 indicating the Galileo was a transport class that entered in 2028. Page 14 gives a half-page to the ship indicating the importance of the class both in Sol system exploration and during the Kzin wars, and includes a color image with an asteroid. A brief section on page 32 provides a sketch and some repeated or additional specs.

• I agree we should forego the transport aspect and focus on this as an experiment in rapid acceleration via fusion. But because the loss of 14 lives with the AFP-1 seemed to be more notable, it would seem that the failure of the Galileo would have been an entire spacecraft one that was seen as both "financial and technological." I'm thinking the EM emissions of the activated fusion drive probably overwhelmed the shipkeeping systems of the vessel, making the entire endeavor a waste of time and funds. The bulbous front section will probably contain the fuel for the drive (hydrogen?), instead of being a cargo pod. The year 2028 seems to be reasonable.

References

---

• Back to "DY sublight series"
• Back to the Table of Contents
• Back to "The Playground"
• Appendix A: Of Ship Statistics
• Appendix B: Glossary
• Appendix C: Starfleet Organization - General Outline
• Appendix D: Abbreviations From Outside