Guide:Columbia - Revision history

Dan: /* See Also */

2023-07-26T18:31:16Z

Dan: /* Notes */

2023-07-21T12:37:20Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 21 July 2023
Line 115:		Line 115:
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	* The initial ''[[Guide: Enterprise\|Enterprise]]'' article was updated by Timo and the ''Columbia'' subclass was broken out as its own. Serious attempts were made to update all related information elsewhere in this Delta Dynamics canon, but any discrepancies may originate with this attempt to update the material.		* The initial ''[[Guide: Enterprise\|Enterprise]]'' article was updated by Timo and the ''Columbia'' subclass was broken out as its own. Serious attempts were made to update all related information elsewhere in this Delta Dynamics canon, but any discrepancies may originate with this attempt to update the material.

			* There was never a ''USS Columbia'': Timo holds firm to beta-canon that she was lost in the war, as an ''[[Guide: Enterprise\|Enterprise]]'' class explorer, and he also explains that the new class was named not after ''USS Endeavour'' (technically the second class to receive the refit, after ''UESS Enterprise''), but in honor of her lost sister.

	* The penultimate paragraph suggests the ''Tritons'' suffered catastrophic losses due to engine failures, however lists ship names associated with the ''Enterprise'' class. These ships have been re-named for Delta Dynamics canon.		* The penultimate paragraph suggests the ''Tritons'' suffered catastrophic losses due to engine failures, however lists ship names associated with the ''Enterprise'' class. These ships have been re-named for Delta Dynamics canon.

Dan at 12:30, 21 July 2023

2023-07-21T12:30:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 21 July 2023
Line 61:		Line 61:
	* ''USS Shenlong''		* ''USS Shenlong''
	* ''USS Soyuz''		* ''USS Soyuz''
	* ''USS Valiant'' ~~(NCC-14)~~		* ''USS Valiant''
	\|design= Doug Drexler		\|design= Doug Drexler
	\|name= Christopher Bennett, ''ST:ENT Romulan War'' & ''Rise of the Federation'' series		\|name= Christopher Bennett, ''ST:ENT Romulan War'' & ''Rise of the Federation'' series

Dan: /* Background: Hobbyist's Guide */

2023-07-21T12:29:28Z

Background: Hobbyist's Guide

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:29, 21 July 2023
Line 91:		Line 91:

	Results of the investigation were not favorable. When the long-idled ''Endeavour'' was paid off in [[2174]], Star Fleet had already decided on peristaltic forcefields as the focusing system for all its future		Results of the investigation were not favorable. When the long-idled ''Endeavour'' was paid off in [[2174]], Star Fleet had already decided on peristaltic forcefields as the focusing system for all its future
	cruisers. The resulting slight drop in efficiency was accepted as the price of vastly increased reliability and safety and the ''Valiant'' ~~(NCC-14)~~ trail-blazed the conversion of the ''Columbia'' class to this type of power generation for the final two decades of operation. The ''[[Guide: Horizon\|Horizon]]'' and ''[[Guide: Advance\|Advance]]'' cruisers that inherited the position of the ''Columbia'' class were content with maintaining rather than challenging its speed records. Star Fleet would not return to the dilithium technology until half a century later and then in greatly altered form. Still, experience would soon show the preferability of dilithium regulation and one is left to wonder whether Star Fleet and the UFP exploration program were unduly held back by the caution of the [[2170s]].		cruisers. The resulting slight drop in efficiency was accepted as the price of vastly increased reliability and safety and the ''Valiant'' trail-blazed the conversion of the ''Columbia'' class to this type of power generation for the final two decades of operation. The ''[[Guide: Horizon\|Horizon]]'' and ''[[Guide: Advance\|Advance]]'' cruisers that inherited the position of the ''Columbia'' class were content with maintaining rather than challenging its speed records. Star Fleet would not return to the dilithium technology until half a century later and then in greatly altered form. Still, experience would soon show the preferability of dilithium regulation and one is left to wonder whether Star Fleet and the UFP exploration program were unduly held back by the caution of the [[2170s]].

	==Gallery==		==Gallery==

Dan: /* Notes */

2023-07-21T12:28:12Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 21 July 2023
Line 120:		Line 120:
	* The ''Star Trek: Enterprise'' novel ''Rise of the Federation: Live by the Code'' indicates, following the conversion of ''USS Endeavour'', ''Buran'' and ''Shenlong'' were the first two new-builds. Three more runs of two each were ordered: ''Apollo'' and ''Soyuz'', ''Ares'' and ''Charybdis'', and ''Phoenix'' and ''Valiant''.		* The ''Star Trek: Enterprise'' novel ''Rise of the Federation: Live by the Code'' indicates, following the conversion of ''USS Endeavour'', ''Buran'' and ''Shenlong'' were the first two new-builds. Three more runs of two each were ordered: ''Apollo'' and ''Soyuz'', ''Ares'' and ''Charybdis'', and ''Phoenix'' and ''Valiant''.

	* ~~There are~~ serious ~~overlap issues~~ with ~~the~~ NCCs, ~~if the lower numbers are provided to~~ the ''~~Columbias~~'' ~~not even started until [[2265]]~~. ~~They~~ ''~~may~~'' ~~get later NCCs assigned~~.		* Because of serious overlaps with other older classes and double-digit NCCs, the ''Columbia'' new-builds will be given registries more aligned with their post-Founding construction. For that reason, I am removing Timo's NCC for ''Valiant''. ''Endeavour'' will keep her hull number of NCC-06, as she was transferred from [[UESF]] to the [[UFP Star Fleet]], with the low number attributed to being in drydock at the time the transferal took place.

	<br><br>		<br><br>

Dan: /* Notes */

2023-07-21T12:19:22Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 21 July 2023
Line 116:		Line 116:
	* The initial ''[[Guide: Enterprise\|Enterprise]]'' article was updated by Timo and the ''Columbia'' subclass was broken out as its own. Serious attempts were made to update all related information elsewhere in this Delta Dynamics canon, but any discrepancies may originate with this attempt to update the material.		* The initial ''[[Guide: Enterprise\|Enterprise]]'' article was updated by Timo and the ''Columbia'' subclass was broken out as its own. Serious attempts were made to update all related information elsewhere in this Delta Dynamics canon, but any discrepancies may originate with this attempt to update the material.

	* The penultimate paragraph suggests the ''Tritons'' suffered catastrophic losses due to engine failures, however lists ship names associated with the ''Enterprise'' class. These ships have been re-named for ~~game-~~canon.		* The penultimate paragraph suggests the ''Tritons'' suffered catastrophic losses due to engine failures, however lists ship names associated with the ''Enterprise'' class. These ships have been re-named for Delta Dynamics canon.

	* The ''Star Trek: Enterprise'' novel ''Rise of the Federation: Live by the Code'' indicates, following the conversion of ''USS Endeavour'', ''Buran'' and ''Shenlong'' were the first two new-builds. Three more runs of two each were ordered: ''Apollo'' and ''Soyuz'', ''Ares'' and ''Charybdis'', and ''Phoenix'' and ''Valiant''.		* The ''Star Trek: Enterprise'' novel ''Rise of the Federation: Live by the Code'' indicates, following the conversion of ''USS Endeavour'', ''Buran'' and ''Shenlong'' were the first two new-builds. Three more runs of two each were ordered: ''Apollo'' and ''Soyuz'', ''Ares'' and ''Charybdis'', and ''Phoenix'' and ''Valiant''.

Dan: /* Notes */

2023-07-21T12:18:15Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 21 July 2023
Line 114:		Line 114:

	==Notes==		==Notes==
	* The initial ''[[Guide: Enterprise\|Enterprise]]'' article was updated by Timo, and the ''Columbia'' subclass was broken out as its own. Serious attempts were made to update all related information elsewhere in this ~~game~~ canon, but any discrepancies may originate with this attempt to update the material.		* The initial ''[[Guide: Enterprise\|Enterprise]]'' article was updated by Timo and the ''Columbia'' subclass was broken out as its own. Serious attempts were made to update all related information elsewhere in this Delta Dynamics canon, but any discrepancies may originate with this attempt to update the material.

	* The penultimate paragraph suggests the ''Tritons'' suffered catastrophic losses due to engine failures, however lists ship names associated with the ''Enterprise'' class. These ships have been re-named for game-canon.		* The penultimate paragraph suggests the ''Tritons'' suffered catastrophic losses due to engine failures, however lists ship names associated with the ''Enterprise'' class. These ships have been re-named for game-canon.

Dan: /* Notes */

2023-07-21T12:17:32Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:17, 21 July 2023
Line 109:		Line 109:

	</gallery>		</gallery>

			==See Also==
			* [[Guide: Enterprise]]

	==Notes==		==Notes==

Dan at 11:59, 21 July 2023

2023-07-21T11:59:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 21 July 2023
Line 57:		Line 57:
	* ''USS Buran''		* ''USS Buran''
	* ''USS Charybdis''		* ''USS Charybdis''
	* ''USS Endeavour'' (NCC-06)		* ''UESS/USS Endeavour'' (NCC-06)
	* ''USS Phoenix''		* ''USS Phoenix''
	* ''USS Shenlong''		* ''USS Shenlong''

Dan at 10:55, 21 July 2023

2023-07-21T10:55:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 21 July 2023
Line 118:		Line 118:

	* There are serious overlap issues with the NCCs, if the lower numbers are provided to the ''Columbias'' not even started until [[2265]]. They ''may'' get later NCCs assigned.		* There are serious overlap issues with the NCCs, if the lower numbers are provided to the ''Columbias'' not even started until [[2265]]. They ''may'' get later NCCs assigned.

	~~==References==~~
	~~<references/>~~

	<br><br>		<br><br>

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 26 July 2023
Line 109:		Line 109:

	</gallery>		</gallery>

			==Star Fleet Registry==
			<div style="-moz-column-count:3; column-count:3;">
			* ''USS Endeavour'' (NCC-06)

			</div>

	==See Also==		==See Also==